Almost 13 years after a state law took effect aimed at ending disputes over “excess” wear charges on returned leased cars, they’re still a potential minefield for consumers, experts say. And dozens of such disputes make their way each year to an arbitration program run by the state attorney general’s office.
So, consumers should proceed with caution when signing a car lease and again when it nears its end, experts recommend. “When you lease a car, the sticker shock comes at the end, not the beginning,” said Jack Gillis, a spokesman for the Consumer Federation of America and author of “The Car Book,” an annual buyer’s guide.
But a lot of the guesswork was taken out of the process by the New York State Automobile Retail Leasing Act — which took effect with leases written after Aug. 11, 1995. The law limits excess wear charges to the actual cost of repair, specifies that consumers can appeal to lenders and set up the attorney general’s arbitration machinery. “Our office receives and acts upon dozens of these requests for arbitration and the vast majority of them end with an agreement between the two parties,” said a spokesman for Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.
The law has been interpreted by Cuomo’s office to apply also to “balloon” loans, which, like a lease, offer low monthly payments. In a balloon note, the consumer, not the lending institution, owns the car and at the end of the term can opt to return it as final payment. As with a returned lease car, it will be resold and, so, is subject to inspection by the lender.
Balloon notes were popular from 2002 until 2005 in New York when some lenders stopped offering leases because of the state’s “vicarious liability law,” which, until Congress took action in 2005, made lenders responsible for damages arising from accidents involving leased cars they owned.
One consumer who went that route was retired building contractor Richard Stone of Dix Hills, who financed a Subaru in 2004 for 48 months. He returned the car in May and, he said that in June lender Chase Auto Finance wrote to him, saying that a noise under the hood suggested engine trouble and that there were several dings and scratches. Grand total to make the car right again: $1,725.
“It really got me aggravated,” Stone, 67, said. “It was like someone trying to pick your pocket.”
He telephoned Chase and disputed the need for engine repairs or cosmetic restoration. Ultimately, nearly all of the charges were waived, including a $300 “disposition” fee, he said. He paid only $92.
Chase wouldn’t comment specifically on Stone’s case, but spokeswoman Mary Kay Bean in Detroit said the same criteria apply to leased or balloon loan vehicles.
Elaine Littwer, legislative coordinator of the National Vehicle Leasing Association, said it’s important for consumers to understand that damage reduces the resale value of a vehicle. “The ‘I don’t own it and I don’t care’ attitude ends up costing them money,” she said.
Brian Rauer, currently in charge of the Long Island and Mid-Hudson offices of the Metro New York Better Business Bureau, said consumers should read the contract before signing a car lease; inquire about any “turn-in fees;” and be sure they understand mileage limitations.”It can be a tricky process,” he said.
BY TOM INCANTALUPO | tom.incantalupo@newsday.com
Tags: auto-_lease_fraud · car_leases · car_lease_excess_wear · returned_lease_carsNo Comments